Posts Tagged ‘file sharing’

Pirate Bay & BitTorrent News

November 17th, 2009

Mashable ran an article earlier today that reminded me of our discussion about BitTorrents and the movement away from centralization last class. The title might be a bit purposefully misleading to grab attention (“End of an Era: Pirate Bay Tracker Shuts Down”), but the content goes into more depth about what this means for people who torrent, particularly those who frequent The Pirate Bay.

Yes, seeing Pirate Bay slowly being shut down, part by part, may be sad, but the beauty of this is that little has changed in the site’s operation for the end user. You can still share and download files on The Pirate Bay, even if the tracker doesn’t work.

And, bringing it home to what this means in the context of Copyright, Commerce, and Culture:

If they succeed, it will be a lot harder for organizations such as RIAA and MPAA to sue the owners of such sites, while the actual process of file sharing wouldn’t change much for the end users.

For anyone who’s been following the Pirate Bay trial (and I know a few of us have been), it’s interesting to consider Pirate Bay tracker shutting down as a sign that lawsuits of this ilk may soon become more difficult for recording and movie industries to pursue. While the site’s original owners have been found guilty for facilitating the breach of copyright law (a verdict they plan to appeal), this case — and the news of the further success of decentralization in torrenting — offer up a way to understand the “future” of file-sharing by looking at its tumultuous past, all the way from the Napster ruling in the early 2000s.

The GNU Imagine Manipulation Program

September 29th, 2009

Reading about open source and free software, as par Richard Stallman’s take, I realized that though I’ve never really jumped on Linux, I do have experience with a certain pet-project of the free software/open source world: GIMP.

~$700 for Adobe Photoshop CS4While I physically cringe searching the title in Google, “GIMP” is a free software photo and picture editing tool. It has many of the same capabilities of the popular Adobe Photoshop software, without the $700+ price tag. Of course, there are some serious advantages to the more costly Adobe product (more filter options, more intuitive controls, enhanced responsiveness), but overall, especially for the casual user, GIMP preforms admirably as a replacement for otherwise outlandishly expensive software.

Prior to reading the Stallman articles I had never really been exposed to the debate about, much less between, open source and free software. I knew bits and pieces about it, but I definitely wasn’t aware that there was such an ideological component underlying the free software argument. Reading “Why Open Source misses the point of Free Software,” however, reminded me of what initially attracted me to GIMP.

I started using Photoshop, in some version, over half a decade ago. I didn’t pay the box price, as my father works for a large government administration and was able to secure a copy that way. When I got my laptop shortly before coming to college, however, I didn’t install Photoshop right away — though I certainly could have badgered my dad for another disc.

After hearing about GIMP, I downloaded it instead to try it out. I liked the sort of spunky, scrappy aspect of using software that more or less did what Adobe did without the crippling cost. Since either version was not going to personally cost me anything, price didn’t factor into my decision nearly as much as a certain respect for the scale of the project that GIMP was tackling.

The GIMP Logo

Though I’m not sure exactly what folks working at Adobe think about programs like GIMP, I think that free — not just the “free speech” type but also the “free beer” type — play an important role in offering an alternative to less-than-legal software sharing. After all, though torrenting software may not require the most advanced computer knowledge or present a huge inconvenience, downloading a program like GIMP requires less technical know-how and takes a lot less effort.

Plus, you don’t have to worry about some angry legal department knocking down your door.