<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ISPs and Copyright Notices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://copyrightcommerceandculture.com/2009/11/16/isps-and-copyright-notices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://copyrightcommerceandculture.com/2009/11/16/isps-and-copyright-notices/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>E59.1405, The Media, Culture, and Communications Department at the Steinhardt School of Education at NYU</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:50:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dvbarros</title>
		<link>http://copyrightcommerceandculture.com/2009/11/16/isps-and-copyright-notices/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>dvbarros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyrightcommerceandculture.com/?p=578#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Verizon&#039;s change of heart doesn&#039;t seem to have any purpose if it wont have any consequences. So I agree with emb16 that this is just the start of something that could potentially be more serious.  Also it is unclear at what point they will start issuing these notices. If I find a rare album on a blog and download it, is that one infringement enough for one of these notices? Will they start to issue some type of three strike rule, where too many notices equals termination of service? It saddens me to think that instead of being invested in customers privacy, they are more interested in partnering up with media corporations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verizon&#8217;s change of heart doesn&#8217;t seem to have any purpose if it wont have any consequences. So I agree with emb16 that this is just the start of something that could potentially be more serious.  Also it is unclear at what point they will start issuing these notices. If I find a rare album on a blog and download it, is that one infringement enough for one of these notices? Will they start to issue some type of three strike rule, where too many notices equals termination of service? It saddens me to think that instead of being invested in customers privacy, they are more interested in partnering up with media corporations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

