<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Authority &amp; Conflict on Wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://copyrightcommerceandculture.com/2009/11/02/authority-conflict-on-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://copyrightcommerceandculture.com/2009/11/02/authority-conflict-on-wikipedia/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>E59.1405, The Media, Culture, and Communications Department at the Steinhardt School of Education at NYU</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:16:51 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://copyrightcommerceandculture.com/2009/11/02/authority-conflict-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyrightcommerceandculture.com/?p=486#comment-87</guid>
		<description>I too, was amazed at what is going on behind the scenes at wikipedia.  I kind of had an idea that there was a culture around it, and I&#039;ve browsed the talk pages before, but it wasn&#039;t until I saw how many different rules/suggestions there are all in the name of consensus when I really grasped it.  I agree with your assertion that dialogue between people with conflicting interests is a wholly positive thing, and I hope that wikipedia continues to function and grow in this manner.  

I think a multiplicity of voices would only add to the positive nature of the wiki-even if more voices led to something more difficult to manage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too, was amazed at what is going on behind the scenes at wikipedia.  I kind of had an idea that there was a culture around it, and I&#8217;ve browsed the talk pages before, but it wasn&#8217;t until I saw how many different rules/suggestions there are all in the name of consensus when I really grasped it.  I agree with your assertion that dialogue between people with conflicting interests is a wholly positive thing, and I hope that wikipedia continues to function and grow in this manner.  </p>
<p>I think a multiplicity of voices would only add to the positive nature of the wiki-even if more voices led to something more difficult to manage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
