<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ringtones ruled not subject to Public Performance Fee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://copyrightcommerceandculture.com/2009/10/19/ringtones-ruled-not-subject-to-public-performance-fee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://copyrightcommerceandculture.com/2009/10/19/ringtones-ruled-not-subject-to-public-performance-fee/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>E59.1405, The Media, Culture, and Communications Department at the Steinhardt School of Education at NYU</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:50:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://copyrightcommerceandculture.com/2009/10/19/ringtones-ruled-not-subject-to-public-performance-fee/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyrightcommerceandculture.com/?p=447#comment-80</guid>
		<description>This is interesting actually: what is the cost of degrading ASCAPs public image? Is it worth the additional revenue from the ringtone community?

When I worked at BMI, my boss said to me one day. &quot;We are really the bad guy out there. What we are in a sense selling is something that no one wants to buy (a public performace license). How do we make someone feel good about purchasing something they don&#039;t want to buy?&quot; 

As such, BMI (and ASCAP for that matter) go to extrodinary lengths to market themselves as the &#039;good guys.&#039; If you look on their websites, especially BMI, they are always posting pictures of BMI employees with singers/songwriters...in affect saying &quot;we are here for you.&quot;

I agree that this case made ASCAP look absurd, and then the best way to sell yourself is to create a positive self-image, such a act might be detrimental to your business. But don&#039;t fret, I think that ASCAP and BMI are going to stick around for quite a while.

http://bmi.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting actually: what is the cost of degrading ASCAPs public image? Is it worth the additional revenue from the ringtone community?</p>
<p>When I worked at BMI, my boss said to me one day. &#8220;We are really the bad guy out there. What we are in a sense selling is something that no one wants to buy (a public performace license). How do we make someone feel good about purchasing something they don&#8217;t want to buy?&#8221; </p>
<p>As such, BMI (and ASCAP for that matter) go to extrodinary lengths to market themselves as the &#8216;good guys.&#8217; If you look on their websites, especially BMI, they are always posting pictures of BMI employees with singers/songwriters&#8230;in affect saying &#8220;we are here for you.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree that this case made ASCAP look absurd, and then the best way to sell yourself is to create a positive self-image, such a act might be detrimental to your business. But don&#8217;t fret, I think that ASCAP and BMI are going to stick around for quite a while.</p>
<p><a href="http://bmi.com/" rel="nofollow">http://bmi.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

