Libraries: Original Free Culture & Ethical Ideal?

September 14th, 2009 by Nicole Leffel Leave a reply »

Hello all. This is admittedly likely to be more related to free culture in general than a specific copyright issue, and if it’s too far removed from the scope of the course I have no problem with it being taken down (or taking it down myself). That disclaimer aside…

Today The Consumerist posted a news article announcing that the city of Philadelphia is closing the Philadelphia Free Library and all its branches on October 2nd, due to the economy and the city’s failure to work out its budget on time. I had a pretty visceral (and expletive-heavy) reaction when I saw this article in the RSS feed for our class.

The Philadelphia Free Library was established in 1891, sayeth Wikipedia.

Libraries, like pay-what-you-can museums and public parks, are cornerstones of functioning societies. They are cultural grounding points, and symbolize an effort on the part of the government to ensure that resources often reserved for middle and upper classes (modern technology, Internet access, archived knowledge, and so on) are made available to everyone. They aren’t just about loaning free entertainment to everyone, though that in itself isn’t an objective that should be sniffed at. Libraries often offer free activities for children whose parents can’t afford expensive after-school programs, to no-fee or very discounted classes for adults looking to build their work skills in order to find a job. They are institutions firmly centered around the idea that information is non-rivalrous and the more people that have it, the better.

The entire library system reminds me a lot of the society Barlow envisioned in his Economy of Ideas, even if it already existed when Barlow was hypothesizing about the future some decade and change ago. There’s this belief that all patrons to this source of free culture will treat the materials with care, respect the facility, and return everything in an orderly fashion so that the flow of information isn’t interrupted. And even if “all patrons” is a bit too ideal, the fact is that most patrons do just this, or at least enough of them that the endeavor is considered worthwhile. If you don’t follow the rules, the worst thing that happens seems to be a nominal fee that you can generally pay at your own leisure, and many branches are super forgiving about seeking reimbursement for late and even damaged materials.

All in all, with so much heated, often vicious back-and-forth going on over copyright and digital “piracy,” what are the ramifications when we can’t even protect the bit of state-sanctioned free culture that we already have?

Advertisement

3 comments

  1. Danny says:

    Thanks for posting. This is sad to hear. My town’s public library was a huge part of my upbringing. It definitely played an important role in my educational development and its sad to think that Philly has to close down its libraries.

    I can’t help but think that the act of these libraries closing (of all places Philly, the hometown of the Declaration of Independence and our nation’s political birth) is a symbol for our culture’s deepening progression into the digital era. I’ve heard people saying it over the years, “just wait, soon enough libraries will all be digital.” I never really believed them. It’s a scary to think that this might be the beginning, and that we’re witnessing it slowly unfold right before our eyes. Think about how much information you can gather, how many books you can read, without having to ever head over to Bobst.

    I thought that the Boing Boing article “Copyright Enforcement versus Privacy” brings up a really interesting point regarding the advent of new technologies….”No one likes stealing, but the problem lies in the fact that current copyright laws are completely unenforceable unless the government or industry groups start to read every e-mail and analyze every form of online communication done by citizens.” I guess this all comes back to Barlow and Tehranian; current copyright laws are outdated and simply do not work. As times changed in England, so too did their early copyright laws…can’t we do the same? After all, this very well might be the beginning of the ‘post-library” age.

  2. This is my third visit to this blog. We are starting a new initiative in the same category as this blog. Your blog provided us with important information to work on. You have done a marvellous job.

Leave a Reply